:stupido2: I'd like to hear the proof elaborated. >_> I mean, what DNA? They already had DNA of Jesus to compare it to? Prove it. He's just making up things.
And all the archeology PROFESSIONALS out there are attacking him for his discovery because it isn't really worth anything.
And like half of Mexico isn't named Jesus as well? He's not the only one in history with that name, in fact, it was a common name already when he was named it. Joshua (someone in the Old Testament) had almost identical names to him although they translated them differently in English. >_>
Unless it says on it,"Jesus who was considered the Christ is buried here with his wife Mary Magdelene" which it would say if it was him, its not him.
Statistical evidence? Did they take in all the people with his same name?
And does it say Mary MAGDELENE on it or just Mary and he's assuming its her? Because he seems to be assuming a lot of things.
Silly people try to prove God to be unreal. I mean, supposedly, scientists proved him to be unreal a long time ago with evolution, but that was just them claiming to do so.
I'll be open-minded and listen to his evidence, but I need it to be elaborated on if its really reliable.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
