'100 months (8.33 years) to save the planet'
An alarming prospect - or just an alarming headline ?
The subject has been quoted as being 'the new religion with heretics who question it being demonised'.
So at the risk of being cast as the devil himself - I open the debate with an alternative view, that it is currently fasionable for our politicians to join in a global (and vote winning) stratagy of a commitment to cutting carbon emmisions, at enormous cost to the british econnomy, impacting on each and everyones standard of living now and for generations to come (if indeed we do save the planet and there are generations to come)
I offer the following link - as further reading :
The REAL inconvenient truth: Zealotry over global warming could damage our Earth far more than climate change | Mail Online



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote
